Frisky Larr (M. A.)
Radio/Television Journalist/Communication Scientist,
Govt. accredited Translator/Interpreter of the English language
Judicially sworn interpreter of English (Regional Court of Bochum)
Germany
Send your email to:
FriskyLarr@aol.com
It is therefore,
all the more surprising that even the most vociferous, voluble and
articulate of such widespread critics simply came to stop at just
one point: Nuhu Ribadu. Even Reuben Abati that would have stopped
at nothing to crucify Olusegun Obasanjo on a double cross slams
the brakes of his soul train at the Ribadu stop. A roundabout turn
with the hands held high saying loud and clear to the Yar’Adua
government: “Hey, Hey, Hey, not that far and not that fast”.
Ribadu is at last publicly vindicated and acknowledged as one good
actor of a widely, albeit not too fairly crucified Captain of a
turbulent sail. Reuben Abati’s Guardian even dared the bold step
of declaring Nuhu Ribadu their man of the year to my applause and
the applause of many well-meaning Nigerians.
The Ribadu Controversy:
Early steps at Damage Control? by Frisky Larr
The worldwide web today has no doubt enhanced
the dawn of a new awareness in the flow of information. Everyone
now has his say, who can pick a keyboard to piece his/her thoughts
together in a prosy narrative. Hobby commentators and self-styled
political observers abound and most often than not, add their
spices to the brewing potion of public controversies. This is
precisely the case in the Nuhu Ribadu controversy. Armchair
quarterbackers will always be up against public outcry and the
basic call to wisdom.
In this context, a lot has been said and a lot
has been written. One point that has however, been credibly
underscored so far, is the high esteem in which the Nigerian
intelligentsia largely holds the man Nuhu Ribadu. The man Nuhu
Ribadu it is that is presently also unveiling the hypocritical
face of the Nigerian class of intellectuals. If statistics were
taken of the ratio of well-read Nigerians condemning the
government of former President Olusegun Obasanjo across the board,
an inner voice tells me that results may disclose figures close to
or in excess of ninety percent. A class of intellectuals that
contends that nothing positive whatsoever can be credited to the
governance of Nigeria in the past eight years has consistently
controlled the public media. A period that is critically acclaimed
as awfully wasted. Middle-grounding is equated with treachery and
objectivity is qualified as blasphemy, to say the least of
outright sympathizing with the cause of Olusegun Obasanjo.
It is therefore, all the more surprising that
even the most vociferous, voluble and articulate of such
widespread critics simply came to stop at just one point: Nuhu
Ribadu. Even Reuben Abati that would have stopped at nothing to
crucify Olusegun Obasanjo on a double cross slams the brakes of
his soul train at the Ribadu stop. A roundabout turn with the
hands held high saying loud and clear to the Yar’Adua government:
“Hey, Hey, Hey, not that far and not that fast”. Ribadu is
at last publicly vindicated and acknowledged as one good actor of
a widely, albeit not too fairly crucified Captain of a turbulent
sail. Reuben Abati’s Guardian even dared the bold step of
declaring Nuhu Ribadu their man of the year to my applause and the
applause of many well-meaning Nigerians.
So, when the government of President Umaru Musa
Yar’Adua finally moved to launch its first step to control the
damages done so far, by the hugely bogged and badly managed coup
of sidelining a hero of the unpredictable intelligentsia, a
Presidential spokesman was to bear the brunt of microscopic
scrutiny. It was precisely the President’s Special Adviser on
Communications (former Journalist) Segun Adeniyi, who faced a
Guardian interviewer.
Aside from flatly denying any Ibori-involvement
in the unfolding scenario, one of the questions he had to contend
with was to elaborate on the plans of the present government to
address the fate of former President Olusegun Obasanjo given the
spate of policy reversals and unmistakable disconnect between both
governments.
In fact, this compatriot was placed in a
position that no sane Nigerian would voluntarily love to swap with
him. As a Presidential adviser, he is very much an insider of the
administration, who probably also shares a huge part of the blame
on the media mismanagement of the Ribadu debacle. Every word he
says, bears an enormous weight and provides an insight into the
reasoning and general state of mind within the President’s camp.
In fairness to him however, not every word he says shall weigh or
should be weighed as a statement on behalf of the government since
his official designation is not that of a Presidential spokesman –
if ever Yar’Adua has one.
After craftily underscoring the importance of
the rule of law as the major policy difference between both
governments, he proceeded to downplay the significance of policy
reversals, which he attributed to changing circumstances and
practical exigencies. He was even fair enough to wash El-Rufai
clean and indirectly indicted the present administrator of the
Federal Capital Territory claiming that El-Rufai had indeed
launched revocation of land allocations, which the new
administrator gullibly sought to credit to himself. On Olusegun
Obasanjo, he finally added: “I don't know what President
Obasanjo did that would warrant a probe panel being set up for
people to now go and be making allegations that cannot stand up in
a court of law so he could be humiliated publicly. … But let's be
fair to the former President, while he is not perfect as none of
us is, he did his very best for this country and doesn't deserve
the current media harassment.”
This is just one comment for which stones would
no doubt have been flying his way without delay, if public
attention were not now severely consumed by the Ribadu fiasco. And
it is precisely his comments on the Ribadu debate that clearly
highlighted the fear, uncertainty and long-term apprehensions
dictating the general calculations in the President’s camp.
Like many commentators have so far expressed,
Mr. Adeniyi indirectly decried the policy of personal stardom that
has so far, publicly translated into the equation of EFCC and the
war against corruption with the person of Nuhu Ribadu. Even though
full of praises for the courage of Ribadu and his achievements
(and thereby, maintaining some tactical tandem with public
sentiments), he went ahead to indirectly accuse Nuhu Ribadu of
lacking humility and of being insubordinate in his dealing with
constituted authority. There could be no missing a covert
reference to dealings with the Inspector-General of Police.
Unfortunately however, this is one side of an
inter-personal story that only active and physical participants
can bear fair and truthful witness to. In determining the holder
of a public office though, it is strongly questionable if such
bagatelle considerations are allowed to gain precedence over
national interest. If President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua held the views
that Nuhu Ribadu was doing a good job in the interest of the
nation, it is questionable if issues of lacking humility and
insubordination could not have been addressed with a lifting of
the warning finger.
It is also interesting to observe the superstar
quality of the one-man show at the Ministry of Justice and at the
Nigerian Bar Association. While the Minister of Justice is
directly subordinate to the President, nothing is out in the open
about shortage of humility on the part of the Attorney General.
But whenever the will is given however, to come up with
questionable character traits on the part of a subordinate
functionary that has fallen out of presidential favor, I have no
doubt that humility and insubordination will be the easiest of
failings to identify in facilitating displacement. They will
definitely be the first reaction when a subordinate attempts to
resist crucifixion and tries a fight back.
Then the Presidential Adviser Segun Adeniyi
touched on another laughable issue of Ribadu not being reconfirmed
by the National Assembly as required by law prior to his
reappointment as Chairman of the Commission. Before him though,
Superstar Aondoakaa had remarked in a hardly unmistakable hint to
corruption culprits so far nailed by Nuhu Ribadu’s investigations,
that all prosecutions initiated by Nuhu Ribadu may be overturned
by the court of law since Nuhu Ribadu was illegally reappointed.
What a bitter desperation this has turned out to be. While the
National Assembly has never complained that its authority has been
usurped, experts have opined that Ribadu’s first term confirmation
was quite sufficient to see him through the reappointment.
Is this pure and unrefined hatred or fear of
some dire consequences of sort if Nuhu Ribadu is not removed now
at all cost? Well, Ibori would be pleased. One fact has now become
certain though, that the President is now very much up against a
credibility problem whilst he finds himself in a helpless corner.
Reading further between the lines in the
comments of the Presidential Adviser Segun Adeniyi, it was easy to
see the picture of a Presidential camp gripped in the fear of
Ribadu. Rather than letting this fear be the beginning of wisdom,
it has ended up being the start of a house-made debacle.
Long ago in another discourse, I cautioned
against the presidential material in the personality of Nuhu
Ribadu that may come to haunt Umaru Musa Yar’Adua if he fails to
tread carefully in handling Ribadu. In a developed democracy, Nuhu
Ribadu would true to it, now be waiting on the sideline for the
next Presidential election in the aftermath of this new year’s
gift of political martyrdom. He would be selling like hotcake for
every meaningful political party.
The President tried his best though, to be
careful on Ribadu and enlisted the tactic of police hierarchy. He
bitterly failed to see and accept the reality that Nuhu Ribadu –
even though a Police Officer – is virtually above the police
hierarchy. He is a political appointee with a very unique and
special assignment that placed him far away from the reach and
authority of the Inspector-General or anyone else except the
President. Yar’Adua’s advisers should have seen this coming if
Nigeria’s first ever university-educated President could not see
this all by himself.
A combination of envy and fear of what may
become of Ribadu if he becomes too big for the corridors of power
to control has virtually pushed Ribadu into a trap that
adversaries may have prepared a clandestine dossier on his
personal weaknesses to assist edging him out far and fast. The
full content of this dossier is yet a mystery.
As a Presidential adviser, Mr. Adeniyi of
course, did (or perhaps, ‘could’) not touch on double standards in
the dealings of the EFCC since this same government may have
benefited from the EFCC’s double standards from the past till
date. Many discerning minds have stressed time and again, that a
nation like Nigeria that has had no standard at all for fighting
corruption in the pre-Ribadu days may do very well kicking off
this fight with double standards (for all anyone cares) as long as
no innocent person is victimized in the process. Future processes
may then be geared toward perfection.
So asked when the President will make his first
comment on the issue, Presidential Adviser Adeniyi betrayed all
sentiments within the government’s psyche: “Come on!” he
said “What do you want to reduce the Presidency of Nigeria to?
You see, part of the problem is that this matter is being
presented as if Ribadu is in competition with the President, that
is why you read about how he cannot be removed by anybody, how he
has powers to arrest even the Inspector General of Police who
nominated him for the NIPSS program.”
And precisely “competition” is what Umaru Musa
Yar’Adua has now indiscreetly achieved in his ill-advised shift of
focus from continuity in the fight against corruption. Funnily,
the President and his team are both continuing to underrate the
seriousness of the situation. “Who the hell is Ribadu?” A very
fatal question indeed. Ask former President Leonid Kuchma of
Ukraine “Who the hell is Yuchenko?“ we will know who he is today.
Ask former military President Jarulzeski of Poland “Who the hell
is Lech Walesa?” we will know that he was a mere electrician
working at a shipyard. What later became of him is now history.
Ask General Akufo of Ghana in 1979 “Who the hell is Rawlings?” we
will know that Rawlings was by far his junior. The rest is
history.
Tunde Idiagbon had to quit the scene because he
was one credible presidential material that would have stood in
the way of many heavyweights alive today, to cleanse the filthy
system.
“Who the hell is Ribadu?” Pray this young man
stands the test of time and live to fight another day. Only if our
democracy grows and the powers let him be. Yar’Adua should speak
out fast and clear the air. The consequences of silence may still
be far away but when they come, they may hurt for real and
precisely at the most painful spot.