Without being prejudicial or judgmental about how Iyabo and her
committee got the contentious N10 million and the propriety of it
all, my real concern is about the unchecked financial recklessness
of those in government. Spending N10 million, on a retreat in
Ghana by a committee of possibly less than ten people is really
worrisome. Nigeria’s socio-economic statistics do not support the
extraordinary profligacy currently in norm with our public office
holders. A senior university lecturer in Nigeria earns less than
N1 million in a year and millions of university graduates vegetate
about for lack of jobs.
IYABO OBASANJO-BELLO: AN HONOURABLE LAWMAKER AS A FUGITIVE LAWBREAKER. by Dotun Oyeniyi
Running away from justice should normally not
be an issue for endless debates. All criminals like to evade
justice. However when the fugitive happens to be an ‘Honourable
Lawmaker’ of a nation, the probing sensibility of the masses will
be greatly aroused.
Until she decided ‘to do a runner’, I have
stood on the side of Iyabo in her strife against the EFCC. I have
done so strictly on principle, not because I know she is innocent
but because I presume her innocent, and everyone of us should do
the same, until a court of competent jurisdiction pronounce her
guilty. That is the minimum, irreducible basic starting point in
all judicial trials.
Like all criminal trials, this one throws up a
curious and frightening spectacle, similar to a game of seesaw at
which on one end sits the massive frame of Mr Goliath and on the
other end sits the tiny, seemingly powerless creature called
David. The Goliath in this analogy is the government personified
by the EFCC with massive resources at its disposal, and the puny
David is Iyabo. In a seesaw contest in which a Goliath takes on a
David, the innate sense of justice inherent in all human beings
will intuitively make us give our solidarity to the latter. This
is exactly what the criminal justice does by ‘saying’, in this
case, Iyabo, we presume you innocent, and we save you the trouble
of having to prove your innocence. You don’t have to, it is the
EFCC that must prove your guilt and it must not just do so, it
must do it beyond every reasonable doubt.
With that starting pedestal, the judicial
system has allayed our fears for the diminutive David. His own
end of the seesaw is now loaded with heavy judicial support
thereby creating a level playing field. So we may then ask why
our own quintessential David - Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello is running
away.
By running away from the EFCC and by extension
justice, Iyabo is losing the support of people (include this
writer) who feel she may be innocent; eroding any vestiges of
honourableness that is left in her as a federal lawmaker; doing a
great damage to both the Obasanjo dynasty and the ebbing integrity
of the PDP, and the worst of all, she is putting the Senate to
shame and exposing Nigeria to a great ridicule.
I cannot imagine the Serious Fraud Office, the
British equivalent of Nigeria’s EFCC declaring that it had a bone
to pick with a British Member of Parliament (MP), and that MP
would as a result go underground. Only an MP, out to dig his own
political grave will engage in such a laughable abomination.
Those who put themselves forward for public
offices in Nigeria appear to consider only the financial gains and
social privileges conferred by political offices. They seem to
forget completely that all privileges come with duties. Both are
like Siamese twins, they are conjoined and inseparable. By
enjoying the privilege of their offices, they have entered into an
unwritten covenant with the nation that they would exhibit such
descent behavioural patterns that will be well above the standard
expected of ordinary citizens. One of those covenants is not to
engage in any acts that will thwart the course of justice, which
exactly is what Iyabo’s present evasiveness portends.
The reason given by Iyabo for presently evading
the EFCC is downright ridiculous. How could anyone who lay any
claim to being a lawmaker and knowing the proper order of doing
things say she wants to go and submit herself at the courts
instead of going to the EFCC? That to me is downright arrogant.
Inspite of the height he attained before his ordeal, Tafa Balogun
did not say he was going to meet the EFCC at the court. Neither
did Alamieyesia nor James Ibori say so. The proper order and
worldwide judicial practice is for an accused to submit to state
agents upon invitation, be it the police or the EFCC. The state
agent reserves the right to arrest, detain and later produce the
person in the court or arrest, grant immediate bail and ask the
accused to meet them at the court. It is now up to the court to
order continued detention of or freedom for the accused as the
trial continues. Iyabo, yours can not be an exception because all
should be equal before the law.
Without being prejudicial or judgmental about
how Iyabo and her committee got the contentious N10 million and
the propriety of it all, my real concern is about the unchecked
financial recklessness of those in government. Spending N10
million, on a retreat in Ghana by a committee of possibly less
than ten people is really worrisome. Nigeria’s socio-economic
statistics do not support the extraordinary profligacy currently
in norm with our public office holders. A senior university
lecturer in Nigeria earns less than N1 million in a year and
millions of university graduates vegetate about for lack of jobs.
100 million Nigerians live below poverty line and the annual
average income of Nigerians is $240, which is the lowest in West
Africa. One pregnant person dies every ten minutes in Nigeria for
lack of money to get proper medical care. Against this gloomy
statistics, I do not know how Iyabo and her committee find the
courage to spend N10 million on a retreat.