If the federal government is headed by a
northerner, does that prevent the southern governors who are
supposedly wiser and more intelligent in government business from
developing their respective domains? Is it the president that
decides how the governors spend the monthly federal allocations to
their states? Why can’t these wise men of the south become models
for the rest o follow? My dear pro-south activist should answer
these questions honestly or hold their peace.
Those who have issues against IBB’s ambition
for the presidency should take him on those issues as an
individual but desist from roping in the north in a phoney agenda.
Perpetual bashing of the north could only serve the purpose of ego
fertilisation but add no value to nation building. We need to
leave the past behind and move forward.
Who Is Afraid Of The North? by Atsar Terver
It is not quite difficult to understand the
psychology underlying the resurgence of petty anti-north
sentiments from a select section of the media
in recent times. It started with some spurious claims of
marginalisation or perceived lopsidedness in the composition of
the Yar’Adua Government in favour of the ‘north’. In responding to
these accusations, the Presidential spokesman, Mr. Segun Adeniji
not only rolled out the statistics of the current composition of
presidential aides but also gave a detailed list of names of key
appointees of ‘southern’ extraction most of which were actually
inherited from the Obasanjo administration to prove that the
allegations were both untrue and mischievous. He observed
correctly that these pro-south activists have suddenly realised
that Nigeria now has four zones instead of six namely North,
South-West, South-South and South-East as if to borrow from a
popular advertisement by Mercerdez Benz ‘there are only two
zones in Nigeria, North and ‘others’-the said advert says:
there are only two cars; Benz and ‘others’.
It is this same categorisation that has placed
a ‘middle-belter’ like me in a position where anti-north
arrows from intellectual critics of my writings could be hauled at
me without apology. Before Obasanjo took over power from the
‘north’ there was a general resentment, essentially orchestrated
by the south-western press, against the North which was hinged on
perceived political domination by the North. I have had cause in
the past to point out the error in this perception and I wish to
repeat myself here that this perception, though very faulty, was
not without some measure of justification because of the long
years of military rule in which the military leaders happened to
be dominantly from the north.
Interestingly the embers hate for the north
subsided significantly during the eight years in which a prince of
Owu, a descendant of Oduduwa held sway at the Villa in Aso
indicating that the noise was coming mostly from the south-west
(in this article therefore wherever the word south appears, it can
be read as south-west). During those gruelling eight years of
Obasanjo’s dictatorship the anti-north or pro-south activist
redirected their energies into praise singing for the ‘shon of
the shoil’. They found every vain reason to applaud their own
including the most insignificant achievements like licensing of
GSM operators to open the doors of Nigeria to the information
gateway. They reasoned that nobody else could have done this even
though they knew silently (but wished not to admit it) that the
blueprint for the liberalisation of communication in Nigeria was
conceived and developed by Abacha before he died. But he deserved
no credit for this because he was a northerner and a ‘demon’ in
their characterisation.
I make bold to state that it did not take much
on the part of the government for GSM to come into the Nigerian
market. The private operators got only paper licences to bring in
their funds and develop their infrastructure. The government did
not use the money they raised through the licensing to upgrade
Nitel’s capacity to support the Networks. NTN and Globacom had to
build their transmission backbones from scratch. So it did not
task the ingenuity of the then president to bring GSM to Nigeria.
In fact any dummy could have done this. But ironically this is
about the only thing these pundits seem to lay their hands on when
searching for a legacy bequeathed to us by that regime. Yet the
same people are quick to tell any listening ear how the ‘north’
destroyed Nigeria for three decades. They fail to tell you that
the devastation of Nigeria which the ‘north’(military) could not
achieve in three decades was easily achieved by their son in just
eight years.
I had written the paragraph below in an earlier
article on January 15, 2007 titled ‘Census:
Blame OBJ and Leave the North Alone’ but I wish to reproduce it
here in view of how prophetic the statement has turned out to be.
As May 2007 approaches, we are thus gradually
slipping back to the pre-1999 era of negative press against the
north simply because it has come to the ‘turn’ of the north to
produce their only second executive president since independence.
I foresee more of this anti-north propaganda in the next 4-8 years
but one thing I can say for sure is that OBJ’s failure should
silence his kinsmen’s virulent attacks against the north. OBJ has
proved that the Southwest is not superior in wisdom to the north
or indeed any other part of the country. Individual leaders must
be held accountable for their actions and not the section of the
country where they come from. So whoever does not accept the
results of the 2006 census should blame OBJ and leave the north
alone.
Yes indeed, those seeking for a reason for our
backwardness must look beyond this north-south dichotomy. In the
absence of any empirical evidence that the south (particularly the
south-west) are more intellectually capable to govern the nation
than any other section of the country, I am inclined to rely on
Obasanjo’s dismal performance to opine that poor governance is
more attributable to individual capabilities rather than genetic
lineage of the individual in the saddle.
What achievement in terms of excellence in
governance have the ‘southern’ Governors attained in their domains
over and above their northern counterparts considering the
disparity in revenues that accrue to them? Reading from these
mischief-makers, you would think those states or federal
ministries headed by the southerners have been transformed to some
heaven on earth by some magical ingenuity whereas the truth on
ground is that most of the thieving former governors are from the
‘south’. Whereas none of the federal ministers from the so-called
‘north’ have been prosecuted for corruption we have the Sunday
Afolabis, Adenike Granges and if am permitted to include Fabian
Osuji all serving ministers who were removed on corruption
charges. We also have a Tafa Balogun who as a Police IG
demonstrated no virtue over and above his northern predecessors.
It needs to be pointed out that these
anti-north sentiments does not reflect the general mindset of the
average Nigerian on the street. Those propagandists are a minority
intellectual class that is bent on taking Nigeria back into the
abyss of religious fanaticism tribalism and sectional agitation
for power for some interest best known to them. Nigerians like a
snail have gradually moved out of the tribal and religious shell
since Jun12 1992 when without coersion or intimidation they voted
overwhelmingly for a southern Muslim for president whose running
mate was also a Muslim. From there, they also voted for Obasanjo
in 1999(but not in 2003 because the election was rigged). So it
does not really matter to the man on the street whether a Mohamed
Usman or a Babajide Ayodele or an Emeka Okonkwo occupies Aso Rock
Villa as long as he is guaranteed food for his table, a roof over
his head, a school for his kids and a road to the market square.
If the federal government is headed by a
northerner, does that prevent the southern governors who are
supposedly wiser and more intelligent in government business from
developing their respective domains? Is it the president that
decides how the governors spend the monthly federal allocations to
their states? Why can’t these wise men of the south become models
for the rest o follow? My dear pro-south activist should answer
these questions honestly or hold their peace.
Those who have issues against IBB’s ambition
for the presidency should take him on those issues as an
individual but desist from roping in the north in a phoney agenda.
Perpetual bashing of the north could only serve the purpose of ego
fertilisation but add no value to nation building. We need to
leave the past behind and move forward.