One thing Nwosu is overlooking is the multi-party structure we
have on ground. The option A4 was good and easy to manage in a
two-party system but its doubtful if it will be effective in a
50-party set up where every party insists to be represented in the
vote. We need to look beyond the method of voting to the totality
of electoral culture. We did not have god-fathers in Nwosu’s time,
elections were not a do-or-die affair, there were no sitting
governors gunning for a second term at all cost, no candidates
were excluded at any level by state machinery through intimidation
and phoney indictments. All these contributed to the successes of
option A4.
June 12: Nwosu Is On His Own by Atsar Terver
What do you make of Professor Nwosu’s recent
declarations on June 12?
Nwosu is on his own. Nwosu can express his views on June 12 as a
private citizen but not in any capacity as the Chairman of the
(then) NEC, so standing at a book launch and announcing the
results of the June 12 Election was in my estimation caricaturist.
In fact strictly speaking, that action was illegal since the court
order, which Iwu claimed, he obeyed by not releasing that result
earlier has not been vacated by another court order. Or is there a
clause in our constitution that after 15 years, a valid court
order can be disobeyed with pomp and impunity?
His actions bespeak comedy. We need to
critically assess the intent of his utterances against he
prevailing political situation in the country. I think Yar’Adua’s
rule of law has created an environment in which people can freely
express their views without fear of intimidation or harassment,
but in exercising this freedom we need to be conscious of our duty
to leave a correct historical heritage for our younger
generations. Nwosu did not state any new fact by insisting that
Abiola won the election. The only new information from Nwosu is
the declaration that IBB did not annul June 12! The wilful and
deliberate distortion of facts for whatever reason is despicable.
There is actually no question as to who annulled the June 12 1993
Election. Most Nigerians in there thirties (and above) must have
heard the announcement on radio by the then Military President,
General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida(alias IBB) on June 23rd
1993 cancelling the historic elections. Newspapers which carried
the story, local and international electronic media would still
have recordings of that speech in their archives. IBB himself has
in previous interviews owned up to the actions of his government
as regards June 12 and even apologised for it. With an officer
like Colonel Umar who together with some twenty-nine other
officers, protested the annulment with a notice of their intention
to retire, still alive, its difficult to understand how Nwosu
intended to sell his lie to the public successfully. This is not
to say that there was no powerful clique in the Army then, that
may have pushed IBB to do what he did, but that will not exonerate
him from responsibility because, he was the President and
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria and that was where that bulk stopped.
Are you saying the Professor’s book is useless?
Not exactly. You see I have not read the book
yet and its very unlikely I will be keen on reading this book if I
eventually lay my hands on it due to the bad taste his preamble
has created. Having said that, I would like to add that there is
always a place for books of this nature for the sake of history
and documentation. Several accounts for example exist of the
Nigerian civil war, which ended before my birth notable among them
are Alex Madiebo's "The Biafran Revolution and the Nigerian Civil
War", John de St Jorre’s "The Brothers' War" Obasanjo's "My
Command". From these accounts one is served a balanced account of
the events leading up to and during the war and of course helps to
mould one’s perception of his country’s past. Any serious future
politician would need to have a full grasp of the politics of June
12, in order to play politics in Nigeria. So it is not only
unpatriotic but also very wicked to blatantly distort facts and
then document them the way Nwosu has attempted to do.
What do you think is driving Nwosu? Some people
believe he was sponsored by some powerful politicians to sell IBB
to the electorate sponsored him…
Well, In Nigeria anything is possible. Our
political market is so money driven that almost any ‘big man’ with
the cash would find a salesman. But it would be unfortunate if IBB
is behind Nwosu because, I don’t personally believe he needs to go
this route if he wants the Presidency again. The Babangida that I
know is simply too smart to fall so cheaply into a trap. I suspect
it is IBB’s enemies that are sponsoring Nwosu. It’s calculated to
paint IBB as a coward, who as C-I-C could not take control of
government machinery at a very critical period but succumbed to
intimidation from officers (and some civilians) under him. It is
engineered to cast IBB in the mould of an irresponsible leader who
would shift the bulk to his juniors. But this is simply not true.
IBB has owned up to June 12 long ago. However I am waiting for him
to come out openly and disown Nwosu’s comments regarding his role
in the annulment. What Nigerians need to hear is not denial but a
humble admission of error and a genuine apology with a pledge to
do things differently if given another chance and I can bet you
IBB can be president again.
Would you support IBB in the next election?
I did not support him during the 2007 election
even though he backed out later. But this is not to say that he is
not good to be president again. It was simply because the
presidency can only be occupied by one person at a time and at
that time my support was for Atiku. But the way Yar’Adua is going
about governance its very likely he will get my vote in the next
election if he contests.
But I wish to
comment that some people have unfairly decided to place a bad tag
on IBB out of hate and jealousy. But fortunately most Nigerians
would tell you that IBB’s military government was more benevolent
to the nation than the veiled dictatorship we had in the eight
years of OBJ. Yes he must have made one or two mistakes, but this
is human. OBJ made mistakes in his first regime too. Apart from
canceling June 12, there is nothing IBB did that OBJ did not do in
his first regime. OBJ was rescued directly from prison as an
ex-convict and sent straight to the presidency. OBJ was never
against the annulment of June 12 elections for which we wish to
crucify IBB but that did not deny him a second chance. Rather he
was the major beneficiary of the whole game. I can bet you that if
June 12 were not cancelled, OBJ would never have smelled the reins
of power a second time.
We have historical accounts of past leaders who got a second
chance despite their mistakes. Look at Uganda’s Obote.As
prime minister, Obote was implicated in a gold smuggling plot,
together with Idi Amin, then deputy commander of the Ugandan armed
forces. When the Parliament demanded an investigation of Obote and
the ousting of Amin, he suspended the constitution, abolishing the
roles of leaders of Uganda's five tribal kingdoms and giving
himself almost unlimited power under state-of-emergency rulings;
he had several members of his cabinet arrested. But later Obote's
judiciary cleared him of the gold-smuggling charges, but the
episode created tensions between him and Mutesa, who was critical
of Obote for suspending the constitution. Obote staged a coup
against Mutesa and had himself declared president on March 2,
1966. His nominally socialist rule made him unpopular with the
Western powers, particularly Britain, and his regime was greatly
destabilized by the military. In 1971 he was deposed by his army
chief, Idi Amin, after which he fled to Tanzania. The elections
that gave him a second term were rigged, leading to guerrilla
rebellion by Yoweri Museveni's National Resistance Army and
several other military groups. Obviously IBB has not done half as
badly as Obote to deny him a second chance.
Back to Nwosu, he suggested return to Option
A4, what is your take on this?
One thing Nwosu is overlooking is the multi-party structure we
have on ground. The option A4 was good and easy to manage in a
two-party system but its doubtful if it will be effective in a
50-party set up where every party insists to be represented in the
vote. We need to look beyond the method of voting to the totality
of electoral culture. We did not have god-fathers in Nwosu’s time,
elections were not a do-or-die affair, there were no sitting
governors gunning for a second term at all cost, no candidates
were excluded at any level by state machinery through intimidation
and phoney indictments. All these contributed to the successes of
option A4.